Field note · unfree / woke

Woke Invasion

How a creed walks into an organization that never invited it — the pipeline, the line of demarcation, and the bargain — illustrated.

Proponents of woke have been proselytizing many unsuspecting organizations — most of which, with a few exceptions, yield to their demands — by adopting a number of covert tactics. The canonical account from education shows the shape of it: nobody votes the creed in, and by the time anyone objects, objecting is itself the offence.

Figure 1 — the mechanismHow the invasion runs

The tactics are covert not because they are secret, but because each single step is unobjectionable. The creed enters as curriculum, arrives as hiring, settles as policy, and ends as the thing that decides what may be said. Every yield becomes the floor for the next demand.

Four-stage pipeline: elite schools, entryism by hiring, policy capture, narrative control — with a feedback loop of escalating demands. STAGE 01 Elite schools The creed is taught as scholarship, not opinion. STAGE 02 Entryism Graduates are hired in — by the ordinary door. STAGE 03 Policy capture Codes of conduct, DEI offices, HR as clergy. STAGE 04 Narrative control “Harm” and misinformation decide what may be said. Each concession becomes the new baseline — demands escalate Outside the org Inside the org
The route from campus to corporate policy. See How did American “wokeness” jump from elite schools to everyday life? and James Lindsay on entryism.
Illustration of DIE (diversity, inclusion, equity) as a zombie-ant fungus taking over its host
The Ophiocordyceps analogy: the fungus does not kill the ant — it drives it, using the ant's own legs, to the spot where the spores spread best. Via @ConceptualJames.

Figure 2 — the tellThe 2016 line of demarcation

Kara Frederick, a former Facebook employee, puts a date on the change in tech. Two cohorts share one building, hired for two different jobs — one to build the product, the other to govern what the product is allowed to carry.

Split panel: employees hired before 2016 versus those hired from 2017 onward, divided by the 2016 election. Hired before 2016 They came to build “A lot of Sheldons who just want to be engineers” Open-source everything The work is the point; politics is somebody else’s hobby Hired 2017 onward They came to govern “Actively turning the organization to political change” Preventing “harm” and misinformation The work is the lever, not the point 2016 — the election
One org, two payrolls, two purposes. The second cohort is not a faction inside the mission — it is a different mission, arriving one hire at a time.

There is a line of demarcation when it came to employees who were hired before 2016 and employees who were hired around 2017 [Trump election]. […] I think there is a lot of Sheldons who just want to be engineers; they just want to open source everything, … and now you have a different type of employees who are working there, and they are actively turning the organization to political change, to preventing “harm” and misinformation.

Kara Frederick, former Facebook employee — source

Figure 3 — the bargainWoke capitalism

Why would a profit-seeking corporation host the thing? One answer, conspiratorial in tone but tidy in structure: it was a trade. The managerial class is appointed steward of the movement and keeps — indeed gains — power; the activists get the transformation they demand. Neither side has to like the other.

A two-band pyramid: a capitalist monopoly on top, socialism below, with power flowing up and transformation flowing down, driven by bank incentives and public scrutiny, and adopted by governments. Monopoly on top the managerial class keeps & gains power Socialism on the bottom activists get the society-wide transformation they demand — “that’s the deal” stewardship → power sanction → transformation financial incentives from banks manufactured public scrutiny … then adopted by governments
The reading a Hacker News commenter gave of Google Docs' inclusive-language warnings: not niceness, not empathy — corporate management of a change in society, in order to keep corporate power through it.
The conspiratorial summary

This is overtly political and has nothing to do with being “nice” or “empathetic”. The corporations have inadvertently made an arrangement with critical theory leftists to transform society into a capitalist monopoly on top, and socialism on the bottom. That's the deal.

It's been dubbed “Woke Capitalism”, where the managerial class has reached a compromise in which they get to keep and — through being appointed as stewards of the political movement — gain power, while activists of the movement get the transformation they demand.

This particular warning in Google Docs is just that. It's Google managing the changes in society that certain activists want, in order to maintain corporate power. Changes like this will keep being added (as we should know by now) while our social structures change into something comparable to a social credit system. These changes are promoted by manufactured social pressures and financial incentives from large investment banks and so are implemented by any company that wishes to grow while under public scrutiny.

Discussions about this have been like groundhog day since 2015, no one seems to be able to get past the surface level of what is probably the greatest transformation of any society since the 1930's, and it's astonishing. It's a gradual escalation of demands from woke activists, backed by the behemoth corporations and banks, then adopted by governments.

For anyone who wants to help others, or to resolve injustices in our society, having true empathy for the plight of those oppressed and wanting to solve social problems: you know this is bullshit. Even for the activists this isn't about actually helping anyone, it's about pushing us into accepting a shuffling of hierarchies, of which they didn't bother to iron out the injustices.

Hacker News, on Google Docs' inclusive-language warnings

The recordConquered ground

Organizations where the invasion is documented, with the date the record was made. This is a sample, not a census — and capture is not permanent: see the counter-examples of Coinbase, Basecamp, Kraken and Twitter, which extricated themselves.

Tech

Google
OpenAI / ChatGPT
Scala

Academia

Harvard

FurtherReading